|

E-mail comments to the Editor
Download the complete PDF of this issue
|
|
Student Exchange
Editor's Note: This is "The Midnight Camels"
group essay from an online course taught by Professor George Takis, UMUC.
The course was designed to provide subject matter professions in depth
learning experiences in effective communication technologies for Internet
teaching at both college and graduate levels. It was demanding!
Producing an On-line Community
Vaughn Jenkes, Nana Korsah, Henry
Petersohn, and Elizabeth Perrin
Introduction and Meta Analysis:
"Community"
As we consider the critical, for Distance Learning,
concept of an on-line community, it behooves us to identify the defining
qualities of "community" per se. With these in hand, we can
both qualitatively and quantitatively identify aspects of technology based,
on-line association and determine whether an "on-line community"
can exist, operationally and pedagogically, as an effective learning entity.
Community (ka myo6/ni te), n., pl.
-ties. 1. a social group of any size whose members reside in a specific
locality, share government, and have a common cultural and historical
heritage. 2. a social group sharing common characteristics or interests
and perceived or perceiving itself as distinct in some respect from
the large society within which it exists (usually prec.
by (the): the business community; the community
of scholars. 3. Eccles,
a group of men or women
leading a common life according to a rule.
4. Ecol. an assemblage of plant and animal populations occupying
a given area. 5. joint possession, enjoyment, liability, etc.: community
of property. 6.
similar character; agreement; identity: community of interests. 7.
the community, the public; society: We must consider the needs
of the community.
Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language,
Random House, 1989.
The first definition makes physical closeness a critical
building block of "community". This might prove troublesome
for our on-line community. On-line students do not reside, necessarily,
in 'a specific locality' nor 'have a common cultural and historical
heritage'. However, in a certain sense, they do share government:
the rules and processes of the Distance Learning Institution. If we move
to definition number two, however, this is as valid for on-line communities
as other communities… "a social group sharing common characteristics
(i.e. one of our identifying common characteristics is our technology-based
communication system) and perceived or perceiving itself as distinct
in some respect, again, Communication Technologies, from
the large society within which it exists. Our second definition
illuminates community qualities that are achievable on-line, and one that
is particularly pertinent the 'on-line' community of scholars.
Definition 5, joint possession, enjoyment, liability, and community
of property, has identity with the on-line community. 'Community
of property' is as much community of intellectual property as
of physical property and is particularly appropriate for members of the
'on-line' community as they create together new formations, clusters and
learning, evoking knowledge in the sharing of common experience. Numbers
6 and 7 are equally appropriate as identifiable characteristics shared
by both " community" and "on-line community": Communities
on line exist as entities as valid and as 'real' as any "off-line"
community. In the future, there may be more substantive exchanges within
communities on-line than off-line. If business, economics, and scientific
research are true indicators of our emerging world, the on-line communities
have capacity, flexibility and vision for our societies that well may
be hampered by the constraints of mere land-locked, "off-line"
communities!
Process:
Building Blocks for On-line Communities
Brown, Ruth, The Process of Community Building in Distance
Learning Classes, JALN Volume 5, Issue 2, P 11 - September 2001
Implementation:
Realization of Process:
Producing an On-Line Community
Building community in an on-line classroom is a significant
undertaking. Its members include people located all over the world who
possess differing backgrounds and experiences. This community includes
mixed sexes, varying age groups, family situations, and educational and
professional backgrounds. As on-line facilitators, it is our challenge
and responsibility to take these many characteristics and meld them to
produce an on-line community that operates efficiently and effectively
and is viable. This on-line community must be free to interact, to share
ideas, and build relationships needed to enhance their learning.
So, where do we begin? Craig
Newmark, President of Fast.Company.com,
indicates that there needs to develop "a sense of connection, an
intimacy, and a feeling that we're all in this together." Kathleen
Mieszkowski, writer for Net Company, states that, "Community
is about connecting people." It involves, "people who have the
potential to interact with one another while having a shared experience".
Our challenge, as instructors, is to initiate communication and assure
an open line is always present for the members of our community. We, the
community's members, all have a great deal we bring to this on-line learning
environment. The experiences and knowledge of our students combined with
ours are significant benefits to assure the community thrives and survives.
Our success in building this on-line community revolves around our ability
to provide the means to initiate an open and effective communication process.
So, how then can we assure this will happen? We must
establish "ground rules" under which all community members will
function. We must allow time for our community to become comfortable with
the available technology used in our on-line environment. One task is
for us to provide a comprehensive and effective orientation to the on-line
concept. This will lessen the confusion and frustration easily resulting
in a learning environment very different from the typical face-to-face
classroom.
We have various options to communicate with the community's
members - email, group work, use of collaborative documents, etc. Early
on in the development of our community we must decide the most effective
methods for communicating, inform the members how we will communicate,
then assure these forms be the norm throughout the life of the community.
The use of too many forms of communication could result in an information
overload leading to wasted time and frustration.
Lastly, we must assure that continuous and effective
communication by community members is established and maintained. As on-line
facilitators, we are responsible to start this process but should then
allow our community members to take charge and lead the way to learning.
Mieskowski concludes, "It's all about people helping one another".
Final Assessment:
To fully implement a productive and viable on-line community,
we, within education, must encourage our students to help each other while
we facilitate the actions of our newly developed viable, thriving, successful
community.
The Midnight
Camels
Elizabeth, Hank, Nana and Vaughn
Resources:
Brown, Ruth, The Process of Community Building in Distance
Learning Classes, JALN Volume 5, Issue 2 - September 2001 http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/VOL5_issue2/Brown/Brown.htm
Harris, Edward l and Solloway, Sharon G., Negotiating
students' needs and desires in cyberspace. Educom Review, Volume 34, Number
2 1999 http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/html/erm99021.html
Mieszkowski, Katherine, Net Company Issue 002 www.fastcompany.com/nc/002/026.html
Rheingold, Howard, Face-to-Face with Virtual Communities,
Syllabus Magazine, July 2001 http://www.syllabus.com/syllabusmagazine/article.asp?id=4135
Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language,
Random House, 1989
About the Authors:
Vaughn Jenkes has had extensive experience in
all levels of education, both as a professor and as an administrator.
He is now within community college administration and also administers
associate degree programs for UMUC in Germany where he has been for the
past 32 years. His wife, Pat is also an administrator for UMUC and a university
faculty member. His interests are extraordinarily broad, ranging from
gardening and baking to flight simulations! He may be reached via email:
vjenkes@ed.umuc.edu
Nana Korsah has a broad background in the International
Business arena and travels extensively, both in the United States and
in Asia. She is committed to distance learning and creating a clear, supportive
environment for Internet learners. She may be reached at: nabk_2000@jahoo.com
Henry (Hank) Petersohn has a Ph.D. in
Business Administration, an MBA in Finance and Industrial Management and
a BS in Economics. He is an author of three texts and a number of articles
dealing with the data processing and telecommunications fields. He is
also a college teacher as well as a professional speaker at a variety
of trade and professional shows and seminars. He has had extensive experience
working with Federal contracting and outsourcing. He may be reached at:
WHPertersohn@JUNO.com
Elizabeth Perrin is an editor of this USDLA
Journal and has spent many years deeply immersed in communication and
Distance Learning. She may be reached at: eperrin@pacbell.net
| |