|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EDITORS PODIUMDrs. Don and Elizabeth
Perrin
How
do you define quality in education? It depends on whom you ask. Everybody is an expert in education because they have been through
the system. They make judgments based on their personal experiences,
and for many it may have been 20 or more years ago. In the interim,
the world has changed a great deal. Today’s education must be
designed for a multicultural global society living in the information
age. It is different. The child is different. The curriculum is different.
The methodology is different. The needs and goals are different. We
once asked Edward Deming how to identify a good teacher. We were discussing
the validity of a “Teacher of the Year Award.” He was against
such awards - said there was no way to make such a judgment in the present.
It might be five years before you knew the results of what the teacher
did and did not do. Furthermore, the results required data – a
lot of very focused data. Teachers
prepare students for jobs – and living – in the future.
It is a pity that our academic organizations are so steeped in the past.
The expertise of parents and politicians and educational leaders is
torqued by the fallacy of their own experience in a very different environment.
Teachers
live in the reality of the present. They are confronted with overwhelming
problems and there is no help in sight. Can we get rid of the baggage
of the past in order to tackle the problems of the present and the future? Many
solutions have been attempted. In education, theories, practices, and
technologies come and go. Education is like the sea. Each new wave washes
some treasure and some trash on the shore and returns it to the sea.
Tides rise and fall. The sun and moon continue their cycles. And education
is so steeped in tradition that it reverts “back to basics”
and practices not appropriate for today’s students. Half
a century ago parents bought encyclopedias to help their children to
learn. Today they buy computers. Human tutors are replaced by tutorial
software. Passive presentations are replaced by interactivity. Educational
technology businesses and foundations are promising replace the folk
arts and sciences of teaching and learning. The
best products are content-rich, highly-involving, and stimulate the
learner. They provide teachers with tools for diagnostic and prescriptive
teaching, individualizing instruction, and setting up Individualized
Educational Programs. Who has the time to try them out or learn to use
them? How do we separate the good from the bad? Edward Deming answered
that question also. Test them, observe them, and gather data. Data!
Data! Data! An
independent authority is needed to evaluate interactive courseware in
a cross-section of education markets. Curriculum should be rated against
national standards – not the standardized tests that have been
administered since the early 20th century, but the new Content
Standards that integrate higher levels of learning with real-world application.
The new learning is often called project-based learning because it requires
hands-on mind-engaging participation – with visible and measurable
results. We
do not have to wait five years to find out what was learned and what
was not learned, and whether the learning is relevant. Industry has
models we can follow. Products are tested as they are developed and
human engineered to be simple, intuitive and effective. Development
procedures used for video cameras and computer software can be applied
to the pharmacopoeia of teaching and learning products for educational
use. This, combined with continuous product improvement, will ensure
rich and relevant resources that stimulate higher levels of learning.
It will provide teachers with standards and validation data to assess
the product for diagnostic / prescriptive teaching and learning, for
individualized educational programs, adult learning, remedial learning,
even recreational learning! Thank
you Edward Deming! Your advice has challenged us to gather meaningful
data that measures the results, not the process. As a result, the future
will be different. After all, the future is what education is about! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Info: Drs. Donald & Elizabeth Perrin |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||