|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive SummaryThe
purpose of this study was to explore the demographic and academic
traits of Fall 1999 online students, to compare them with those of
Santa Barbara City College and peer traditional students (students
enrolled on campus in ACCT 230, for example, as opposed to students
enrolled in ACCT 230 online) and to investigate the opinions of online
students regarding their online course delivery experience. The study
combined data from SBCC's student data system with students' responses
to a questionnaire. The questionnaire was first mailed on October
20, 1999. A follow up was mailed on November 17, 1999. The response
rate was 50.6% and the respondents were representative of the online
student population. The
development and implementation of online course delivery is a challenging
task for any institution. Santa Barbara City College has evolved considerably
in only five semesters in the breath, quality and quantity of online
course offerings. Student satisfaction with all aspects of online
course delivery is very high and, as summarized below, most of them
expressed interest in repeating the online format. This
study represents a first comprehensive attempt to evaluate online
course delivery at SBCC and reflects data for one semester. In order
to better understand and track the progress of online courses, further
studies are needed that will compare data from multiple semesters.
The findings of this study should be viewed as formative evaluation
meant to inform the College community and facilitate improvement rather
than summative conclusions leading to final decisions about the effectiveness
of online course delivery. It is our intention to continue these studies
and to incorporate a comparative approach of multiple semesters.
Course
Offerings and Enrollment
From
two online courses offered in Fall 1998, the College has expanded
its online courses offerings to 28 different courses in Fall 1999
and 46 in Spring 2000. Of the Fall 1999 online courses, 17 were totally
online (no on campus attendance required), 7 were hybrid (most instruction
is online and some on campus attendance is required) and 4 were partially
online (most instruction is on campus with an online instructional
component). The growth in online course enrollment has also been very
rapid, demonstrating that the College is responding to the needs and
preferences of students and attracting students who would not have
otherwise enrolled at the College. A total of 655 students enrolled
in at least one online class in Spring 1999, 1,176 in Fall 1999, and
1,366 in Spring 2000 (as of March 23, 2000. It is estimated that the
total number of students enrolled in online classes in Spring 2000
will reach 1,500). 10%
of the Fall 1999 online students took an online course in prior semesters
and 11% repeated the online experience in Spring 2000. 447 (38%) of
the Fall 1999 online students enrolled only in online classes. These
students would not have enrolled at the College if online delivery
were not available. The unduplicated online enrollment as of the Fall
1999 census day of classes represented 7% of the total unduplicated
headcount. This percentage suggests that online enrollment has already
became an important part of the overall college enrollment.
Student Demographic CharacteristicsThe
Fall 1999 online students have a slightly higher percentage of female
students - 56% - compared to 50% for SBCC and 51% for peer on-campus
courses. Overall, online students are comparable in terms of age to
the college average and slightly older than students in peer on-campus
courses. The ethnic distribution of online students closely mirrors
that of SBCC and peer courses. This is an important finding of the
study as the College strives to represent the ethnic and gender make
up of the community, in general. The nature of course offerings in
Fall 1999 skews the ethnic distribution by type of online class. The
partially online classes have a higher representation of Hispanic
students than the other online courses because these courses generally
attract more minorities. Examples include English as a Second Language
and Chicano Studies. The three demographic characteristics combined
indicate an emerging pattern. Hybrid courses tend to consist of white
females of an average age of 31. Totally online classes are still
dominated by white females, younger, but there is a better gender
balance than in hybrid courses. Partial courses are dominated by younger
male students and, as explained earlier, there are more minority students
than in the other types of online classes.
Student SuccessThe
area of student success reveals both areas where the online course
delivery has made progress as well as some areas that need improvement.
Overall, the course attrition is higher for online courses than for
SBCC, in general, and for peer on-campus courses, in particular. Hybrid
courses exhibit the highest course attrition rate by the census day
of the courses. 47% of hybrid course students dropped their courses
by the census day. However, the number of hybrid courses is significantly
lower than that of totally online classes. Totally online courses,
which represent the majority of online offerings, have a low attrition
rate by census: 18% compared to 24% for the college and 23% for peer
courses. The attrition after the census day of the courses is very
similar for the three types of online courses: 23% for hybrid courses
and 24% for totally online and partial courses. These rates are higher
than the SBCC rate of 16% and the peer course rate of 15%. It is important
to note that SBCC's attrition rates are lower than those experienced
by other colleges offering online instruction. One factor that contributed
to the higher after census attrition in Fall 1999 online courses compared
to SBCC and peer courses is the phenomenon of "hidden" withdrawals.
All courses have a deadline for dropping the class without a "W"
being assigned to the permanent record of the student. In traditional
on campus classes, faculty can easily identify and record "no
show ups" – students who registered for the class but did
not attend the first class sessions – and students who withdrew
before the census day of the class. In online classes, however, students
who are not aware of the drop deadline or who do not make their intention
known to the instructor, can easily "hide" without the instructor
being aware of their intention by the census day of the course. This
explains the shift in withdrawals for totally online classes from
before the census day of the course to after the census. Trying
to predict the probability that a student will withdraw from an online
course has not been revealing. The various variables available in
the student data system used in a logistic regression explained only
18% of the decision to drop an online course. Clearly, more research
is needed to pinpoint more closely the reasons for student withdrawal,
assuming that there are other, academically related reasons besides
the personal ones. In
Fall 1999, 52% of online students received a passing grade (A, B,
C, D or CR), compared to 73% of students in peer courses and 71% of
SBCC students. According to a recent article in the Chronicle of Higher
Education, this situation is common for many colleges offering online
courses. Hybrid courses are an exception, with higher percentages
of both successful and passing grades than the other two types, when
Ws are included in calculation. The gap between online courses, the
college and peer courses becomes smaller when the grade distribution
is calculated only for those who persisted through the end of their
courses (excluding Ws). Without Ws, online classes, generally, are
still behind the college and peer course averages, but the improvement
is visible. Again, this indicates that if the "hidden" withdrawal
phenomenon is resolved, the grade distributions in online courses
will more closely mirror those of traditional courses. Hybrid courses
are the closest to the college and peer course averages if Ws are
not included. This suggests that those who persist in this type of
classes do better grade-wise than their counterparts in totally online
and partial courses. This seems a normal consequence given that students
in hybrid classes have higher GPAs than students in the other two
types and have completed, on average, a larger number of units at
SBCC. This indicates that these students have had better academic
success at SBCC and have formed a discipline of study through their
prior courses.
Student SatisfactionThe
student opinion and satisfaction survey reveals that online course
delivery is highly responsive to the students' needs and preferences.
Students praise the flexibility of the format, the quality of offerings,
and the feedback from instructors. 68% of the respondents indicated
that they like online courses equally or better than on campus classes.
73% of respondents indicated that they would take another online class
and 21% were inclined but not positive that they would repeat the
online format. 80% of respondents felt that the feedback they received
from their instructors was very helpful and 45% indicated that the
online interaction with other students is beneficial to their learning.
56% of the respondents took the courses to meet general education
or major requirements. Students
were not exactly sure of the difference between online and traditional
courses regarding the improved mastery of course content due to the
online format. 31% of the respondents indicated that they understand
ideas and concepts better than they would in a more traditional class
and 39% of respondents said they are better able to visualize the
ideas and concepts presented than they would in a more traditional
format. The
majority of students do not feel that they had technical difficulties
in accessing their online course materials. 77% of respondents felt
they did not spend much time trying to access the course site on the
Web and 85% thought that they have the necessary computer skills. From
the students' responses, it is evident that online courses achieve
one of their major purposes, which is to provide the flexibility that
many students need to engage in college education. 88% of the students
indicated that they are better able to juggle their coursework with
their other work and personal responsibilities than they would in
a traditional format. 36% of the respondents indicated that they would
not have taken the course if it were not available online and 55%
would have taken it on campus only if it were offered at a convenient
time. Their presence in the online class indicates that this format
provided the time convenience students needed. 62% of the respondents
worked at least 21 hours per week, with 46% working more than 30 hours
per week. Although
73% of the students indicated that they would characterize their online
classes as at least equally demanding compared to on-campus courses,
their grade expectations exceed the real outcome. 91% of the respondents
thought they would receive a passing grade. This suggests that students
believe online courses would be easier to pass then traditional classes.
Students do not seem to engage enough in the general online orientation
before beginning their courses. Of all online students who responded
to the survey, 34% did not take the general online orientation and
40% of totally online students did not either. However, since each
of the online courses offers its own online orientation, it is likely
that students participate in the course specific orientation rather
than the general one.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
About the Author: Dr.
Andreea M. Serban is the Director of Institutional Assessment, Research
and Planning at Santa Barbara City College. She has a Doctorate in Education
and a Master of Science in Higher Education Administration from State
University of New York at Albany and a Bachelor of Science in mathematics
from University of Bucharest. She is a published author and associate
editor of: Planning for Higher Education, the journal of Society for College
and University Planning and The Professional File, a publication of the
Association for Institutional Research. Policy analysis, higher education
planning and finance, and applications of computer technologies complement
her expertise in research and evaluation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||